Torque Tank SX Review (2026 HFA Prototype)

First Look: A True Evolution of the Torque Tank Line

The Torque Tank SX looks like a deliberate step forward in Torque’s sled lineup. From what was shown at the 2026 HFA Show, this appears to be the natural replacement for the MX while borrowing heavily from the design and usability of the M3.

At first glance, the SX feels like a hybrid. It combines the rugged, straightforward build of the MX with the smoother handling and versatility of the M3. That’s something a lot of gyms and athletes have been wanting for a while.

Torque Tank SX Sled Front — Prototype – AI Generated

Torque Tank SX Sled Monitor — Prototype – AI Generated

The images above were AI generated to remove the backgound from actual images of the the SX Tank.

Build & Design: Familiar, But Smarter

The SX keeps the 4-wheel sled design, but everything about it feels more refined and purpose-built.

The airless tires are a major win. No maintenance, no flats, and consistent performance across different surfaces. That alone makes it more appealing for commercial settings.

One of the biggest upgrades is the rear wheel setup. The two rear wheels spin, which makes turning significantly easier than the MX. Anyone who has used the MX knows how clunky it could feel when trying to change direction. The SX fixes that.

The handles are pulled straight from the M3, which is a smart move. You get multiple grip options and the ability to perform wheelbarrow carries, which adds a lot more functionality than a standard sled.

It’s also noticeably heavier than the M3. That added weight improves traction and creates more natural resistance during both pushes and pulls.

Torque Tank SX Sled Side — Tank SX Prototype – AI generated to remove background

The SX keeps the 4-wheel sled design, but everything about it feels more intentional.

Airless Tires: A big win. No flats, no maintenance, and consistent performance across surfaces.
Rear Spinning Wheels: This is one of the biggest usability upgrades. The dual spinning rear wheels make turning dramatically easier compared to the MX, which could feel clunky when changing direction.
M3-Style Handles: Torque reused one of their best features here. Multiple grip positions + the ability to do wheelbarrow carries adds a ton of functional training options.
Heavier Frame: Noticeably more substantial than the M3, which translates to better traction and smoother resistance.

Overall, it feels like Torque listened to real user feedback and built something more practical for everyday use.

Resistance and Performance

From my understanding Torque is positioning the SX as having more resistance than the MX, and based on the design and added weight, that makes sense.

In use, that should translate to more consistent drag and a better challenge for stronger athletes. Instead of relying purely on loading plates, the sled itself contributes more to the resistance.

Because it is heavier than the M3, it grips the ground better. That shows up in sled pushes, backward drags, and heavy pulls. It should also make wheelbarrow carries feel more controlled and demanding.

Overall, this feels less like a light conditioning sled and more like a true strength and conditioning tool.

The standout claim—and based on early impressions, a valid one—is increased resistance over the MX.

What that means in practice:

More consistent drag across different speeds
Better challenge for stronger athletes
Less need to stack excessive plates to feel resistance

Because the SX is heavier than the M3, it naturally creates more friction and grip, especially during:

Sled pushes
Backward drags
Heavy pulls
Wheelbarrow carries

This added resistance makes it feel closer to a true strength tool rather than just a conditioning piece.

Maneuverability

This is where the SX really separates itself from the MX.

The turning radius feels much closer to the M3, which is a huge improvement. The spinning rear wheels allow for smoother transitions, making it easier to use in tighter spaces or in group training environments.

For gyms running circuits or classes, this alone makes a big difference in usability.

Turning radius similar to the M3
Rear wheels pivot smoothly
Easier transitions in tight spaces
More fluid for group classes or circuit-style training

This alone makes it far more practical for commercial gyms, CrossFit boxes, and HYROX-style setups.

Versatility

The SX goes beyond just push and pull work.

With the M3-style handles, you can incorporate wheelbarrow carries, which adds a completely different training stimulus. The dual weight horns also make it easy to scale resistance without throwing off balance.

This opens the door for forward pushes, backward drags, angled work, carries, and heavier resistance training all on one piece of equipment.

The SX expands beyond basic sled work:

Wheelbarrow carries (thanks to M3-style handles)
Forward + backward sled work
Rotational and angled pushes
Weighted resistance training with dual horns

The addition of two weight horns means you can scale resistance easily without compromising balance.

Prototype SX Tank – AI generated to remove background – No bar in the basket

SX vs MX vs M3

The SX feels like the most complete option of the three.

The MX is more basic and less maneuverable, with a lower resistance ceiling. The M3 is smooth and versatile but lighter, which means less built-in resistance. The SX combines the best parts of both while improving on their limitations.

It essentially fills the gap that existed between the MX and M3.

Torque Tank SX

Best all-around option
Highest resistance (expected)
Improved turning
Most versatile

Torque Tank MX

Entry-level feel
Less maneuverable
Lower resistance ceiling

Torque Tank M3

Smooth and versatile
Great handles
Lighter → less natural resistance than SX

👉 The SX feels like the missing link between power and usability.

Who It’s Best For

This is a strong fit for commercial gyms that want a durable, low-maintenance sled. It also makes sense for performance facilities focused on strength and conditioning, as well as HYROX or functional fitness athletes.

For garage gyms, it could be a one-sled solution that covers multiple training styles.

Commercial gyms wanting a durable, low-maintenance sled
Performance facilities focused on strength + conditioning
HYROX / functional fitness athletes
Garage gym owners who want one sled that does everything

Potential Downsides

Since this is still a prototype, pricing is unknown but will likely be higher than both the MX and M3. The added weight, while beneficial for resistance, may be a downside for beginners or those looking for a lighter sled.

The resistance curve and long-term durability will need to be tested once production models are available.

Likely higher price point than MX/M3
Heavier weight could be a downside for beginners
Final resistance curve still needs full testing

Final Thoughts

The Torque Tank SX looks like a meaningful upgrade and a likely new flagship for Torque. It takes what worked with the M3, improves on the limitations of the MX, and adds more resistance and usability across the board.

If it delivers on the resistance claims, this could quickly become one of the best all-purpose sleds available.

If you want, I can expand this into a full 1500 to 2000 word GearMashers review with pros and cons icons and a HYROX sled comparison.